Skip to main content

Evidential Proximity, Independence, and the evaluation of carcinogenicity

Williamson, Jon (2019) Evidential Proximity, Independence, and the evaluation of carcinogenicity. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, . ISSN 1356-1294. (doi:10.1111/jep.13226) (KAR id:75285)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Download (760kB) Preview
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
Official URL


This paper analyses the methods of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) for evaluating the carcinogenicity of various agents. I identify two fundamental evidential principles that underpin these methods, which I call Evidential Proximity and Independence. I then show, by considering the 2018 evaluation of the carcinogenicity of styrene and styrene‐7,8‐oxide, that these principles have been implemented in a way that can lead to inconsistency. I suggest a way to resolve this problem: admit a general exception to Independence and treat the implementation of Evidential Proximity more flexibly where this exception applies. I show that this suggestion is compatible with the general principles laid down in the 2019 version of IARC's methods guide, its Preamble to the Monographs.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/jep.13226
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Divisions: Faculties > Humanities > School of European Culture and Languages > Philosophy
Depositing User: Jon Williamson
Date Deposited: 10 Jul 2019 14:58 UTC
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2019 10:53 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Williamson, Jon:
  • Depositors only (login required):


Downloads per month over past year