Skip to main content

Accuracy in the identification of orchids of the genus Angraecum by taxonomists and non-taxonomists

MacKay-Smith, Thomas H., Roberts, David L. (2019) Accuracy in the identification of orchids of the genus Angraecum by taxonomists and non-taxonomists. Kew Bulletin, 74 . Article Number 27. ISSN 0075-5974. E-ISSN 1874-933X. (doi:10.1007/S12225-019-9813-6) (KAR id:75168)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download (548kB)
[thumbnail of __bodiam_CUR_ecs33_My Files_Mackay-Smith & Roberts 2019 Kew Bulletin (1).pdf]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX) Pre-print
Language: English
Download (75kB)
[thumbnail of Mackay-Smith & Roberts 2019 Kew Bulletin.docx]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-019-9813-6

Abstract

Misidentification of taxa is understudied but has the potential to be a highly problematic issue. If misidentification is prevalent, there could be significant ramifications for work which relies upon a reliable taxonomic base, such as the description of new species, estimating the size of populations and species prioritisation. Here we used a match-mismatch experiment from psychology to determine the accuracy of species identification in 20 pairs of orchids (Angraecum spp. from Madagascar). The participants were split into specialist taxonomists and non-taxonomists. There was a 57.2% accuracy across all the participants. The specialist taxonomists had a high accuracy of 80.0%, with a sensitivity analysis producing an upper accuracy estimate of 90.7%. Non-taxonomists had a much lower accuracy of 55.9%. The results provide evidence of the need for specialist taxonomists, particularly in the case of identifying Malagasy orchids. Nevertheless, since misidentification is still prevalent for specialists, this is an issue that requires further research to understand how accurate identifications are made and also the implications of errors.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1007/S12225-019-9813-6
Uncontrolled keywords: citizen science, classification, expert judgement, Madagascar, misidentification, Orchidaceae, plant conservation
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Q Science > QK Botany
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: David Roberts
Date Deposited: 03 Jul 2019 07:07 UTC
Last Modified: 09 Dec 2022 00:30 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/75168 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Roberts, David L.: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6788-2691
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year