Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

The responsibility to protect and the question of attribution

Aistrope, Tim, Gifkins, Jess, Taylor, N.A.J. (2018) The responsibility to protect and the question of attribution. Global Change, Peace and Security, 30 (1). pp. 1-15. ISSN 1478-1158. E-ISSN 1478-1166. (doi:10.1080/14781158.2018.1430026) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:72275)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of The Responsibility to Protect and the question of attribution.pdf]
Official URL:


This article explores the problem of attribution in the context of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) intervention through an analysis of the Syrian chemical weapons attack of 2013. We argue that R2P advocates can be confronted by a crisis dynamic where the political momentum for military intervention runs ahead of independent verification and attribution of mass atrocity crimes. We contrast the political momentum for intervention with the technical process of independent attribution and show that the sort of independent evidence that would ideally legitimize an R2P intervention was unavailable when there was political momentum for action. Conversely, the information that was available (which inevitably informed the political momentum for action) was largely produced by state intelligence organizations - or a potentially briefed media - and shaped by the interests and priorities of its end users. While understandable in the face of the 'extreme', we suggest that the mobilization of political momentum by R2P advocates entails significant dangers: first, it risks undermining the integrity of R2P if evidence is later discredited and second, it risks amplifying the perception that states sometimes exploit humanitarian pretexts in pursuit of other strategic ends.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/14781158.2018.1430026
Uncontrolled keywords: Arms control, Attribution, Chemical weapons, Epistemic communities, Intervention, Responsibility to protect, Syria
Subjects: J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations
Depositing User: Timothy Aistrope
Date Deposited: 15 Feb 2019 11:00 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2024 17:14 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.