Skip to main content

The responsibility to protect and the question of attribution

Aistrope, Tim, Gifkins, Jess, Taylor, N.A.J. (2018) The responsibility to protect and the question of attribution. Global Change, Peace and Security, 30 (1). pp. 1-15. ISSN 1478-1158. (doi:10.1080/14781158.2018.1430026) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
http://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2018.1430026

Abstract

This article explores the problem of attribution in the context of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) intervention through an analysis of the Syrian chemical weapons attack of 2013. We argue that R2P advocates can be confronted by a crisis dynamic where the political momentum for military intervention runs ahead of independent verification and attribution of mass atrocity crimes. We contrast the political momentum for intervention with the technical process of independent attribution and show that the sort of independent evidence that would ideally legitimize an R2P intervention was unavailable when there was political momentum for action. Conversely, the information that was available (which inevitably informed the political momentum for action) was largely produced by state intelligence organizations - or a potentially briefed media - and shaped by the interests and priorities of its end users. While understandable in the face of the 'extreme', we suggest that the mobilization of political momentum by R2P advocates entails significant dangers: first, it risks undermining the integrity of R2P if evidence is later discredited and second, it risks amplifying the perception that states sometimes exploit humanitarian pretexts in pursuit of other strategic ends.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/14781158.2018.1430026
Uncontrolled keywords: Arms control, Attribution, Chemical weapons, Epistemic communities, Intervention, Responsibility to protect, Syria
Subjects: J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations > Centre for Critical Thought
Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations > Conflict Analysis Research Centre
Depositing User: Tim Aistrope
Date Deposited: 15 Feb 2019 11:00 UTC
Last Modified: 19 Jul 2019 11:19 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/72275 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):