Monopoly versus R&D-integrated Duopoly

Amir, Rabah and Nannerup, Niels and Stepanova, Anna and Eguiazarova, Eline (2002) Monopoly versus R&D-integrated Duopoly. Manchester School, 70 (1). pp. 88-100. ISSN 1463-6786. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)

The full text of this publication is not available from this repository. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00285

Abstract

In the standard two-stage framework of R&D/product market competition, this paper provides a performance comparison between monopoly and the cartelized research joint venture, using two well-known models based on different versions of the R&D spillover process. According to the model with a wider scope of application, monopoly always leads to a higher propensity for R&D and, when R&D costs are low, to the best overall market performance. The results also allow for a comparison between the two underlying models of strategic R&D.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Economics
Depositing User: Anna Stepanova
Date Deposited: 09 Mar 2009 23:55
Last Modified: 15 Apr 2014 12:50
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/7180 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year