Peer Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science

Davis, William E. and Giner-Sorolla, Roger and Lindsay, D. Stephen and Lougheed, Jessica P. and Makel, Matthew C. and Meier, Matt E. and Sun, Jessie and Vaughn, Leigh Ann and Zelenski, John M. (2018) Peer Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, . ISSN 2515-2459. E-ISSN 2515-2467. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918806489) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)

Abstract

More and more psychological researchers have come to appreciate the perils of common but poorly justified research practices, and are rethinking commonly held standards for evaluating research. As this methodological reform expresses itself in psychological research, peer reviewers of such work must also adapt their practices to remain relevant. Reviewers of journal submissions wield considerable power to promote methodological reform, contributing to the advancement of a more robust psychological literature. We describe concrete practices that reviewers can use to encourage transparency, intellectual humility, and more valid assessments of methods and statistics.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled keywords:	Peer review, open science, guidelines, methods, statistics
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions:	Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User:	Roger Giner-Sorolla
Date Deposited:	17 Sep 2018 21:09 UTC
Last Modified:	28 Nov 2018 16:19 UTC
Resource URI:	https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/69135 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)