Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Fences can support restoration in human-dominated ecosystems when rewilding with large predators

Bull, Joseph, Ejrnæs, Rasmus, Macdonald, David W., Svenning, Jens-Christian, Sandom, Christopher (2019) Fences can support restoration in human-dominated ecosystems when rewilding with large predators. Restoration Ecology, 27 (107). pp. 198-209. ISSN 1061-2971. (doi:10.1111/rec.12830) (KAR id:68469)

This is the latest version of this item.

PDF (Article version) Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Article version]
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
[thumbnail of _system_appendPDF_proof_hi.pdf]
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Official URL:


The use of fences in conservation can be controversial, as artificial barriers constrain natural behavior and ecological dynamics. However, in the case of large predators inhabiting protected areas within a hostile human‐dominated landscape, predators may remain at low densities if they face high mortality upon leaving the reserve. In turn, this may compromise the potential for density‐dependent effects such as top‐down regulation of prey species abundance. We simulate the hypothetical reintroduction of gray wolves (Canis lupus) to reserves in their former range (Scottish Highlands), with the objectives of identifying parameters that allow a viable wolf population and the potential for direct top‐down forcing of red deer (Cervus elaphus) densities. We examine the extent to which the number of dispersing wolves leaving the protected area influences whether these objectives are achieved. Our simulations confirm that source‐sink population dynamics can result in a self‐perpetuating wolf population, but one that never achieves densities needed for strong top‐down forcing. When wolf density is weakly controlled by intraspecific competition, strong top‐down forcing occurs when 20% of dispersing wolves or less leave the population. When 20–35% of dispersing wolves leave, the strength of top‐down forcing is highly variable. The wolf population remained viable when 35–60% of dispersing wolves left, but then did not exert strong top‐down forcing. Wolves were vulnerable to extinction at greater than 60% disperser loss. Despite their negative connotations, fences (including semi‐permeable ones) could increase the potential for interspecific density‐dependent processes in some cases, thereby facilitating trophic rewilding.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/rec.12830
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Depositing User: Joseph Bull
Date Deposited: 01 Aug 2018 08:27 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2024 18:07 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

Available versions of this item

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.