Hector, a new methodology for continuous and pattern-free heliostat field optimization

Cruz, N.C. and Salhi, Said and Redondo, J.L. and Álvarez, J.D. and Berenguel, M. and Ortigosa, P.M. (2018) Hector, a new methodology for continuous and pattern-free heliostat field optimization. Applied Energy, 225 . pp. 1123-1131. ISSN 0306-2619. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.072) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)

PDF - Author's Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 May 2019.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Contact us about this Publication Download (595kB)
[img]
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.072

Abstract

In the framework of central receiver solar plants, the heliostat field can take up to 50% of the initial investment and cause up to 40% of energy loss. The most popular design strategies are based on: (i) forcing heliostats to follow known distribution patterns and (ii) iterative selection of positions. However, these methods might produce suboptimal solutions. The evolution of computational platforms allows the development of more flexible approaches. In this work, Hector, a new meta-heuristic aimed at facilitating coordinate-based optimization, is presented. First, since East-West symmetry is imposed, one of those regions is ignored and the number of heliostats to be placed is halved. Second, the selected region is split into separate circular sectors around the receiver. Next, at every iteration, a new heliostat is added to the most promising sector. Then, it is optimized by a user-selected algorithm, as an independent problem, in a continuous search-space. This procedure is repeated until all the required heliostats have been deployed. The computed half is finally cloned into the other one. Two versions of this strategy are proposed. Our empirical results show that, for a given optimizer, better fields are obtained with Hector. The second version yields the best fields but requires more runtime.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: Concentrated solar power, Central receiver systems, Heliostat field design, Optimization, Meta-heuristic for problem division
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School
Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School > Management Science
Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School > Centre for Logistics and Heuristic Organisation (CLHO)
Depositing User: Said Salhi
Date Deposited: 04 Jul 2018 12:56 UTC
Last Modified: 07 Aug 2018 15:03 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/67559 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Salhi, Said: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-5240
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year