Skip to main content

Evaluating the Feasibility of an Investment for Improving Drinking Water Quality in South Korea

JANG, CHEUL (2018) Evaluating the Feasibility of an Investment for Improving Drinking Water Quality in South Korea. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:66641)

Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only until 2021.
Contact us about this Publication


This dissertation aims to test the feasibility of improving the quality of drinking water in a target area in South Korea. The problem with drinking water quality is caused by pollution of the water environment. Most waterworks in South Korea are unable to handle problems like an unpleasant taste or odour in tap water. Improving raw water quality through prevention of water pollution is explored in pursuit of a long-term solution. However, this research focuses on advanced water treatment systems for a short-term solution and mainly tests the extent to which an investment in one chosen waterworks is feasible. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is used to test the feasibility of two advanced water treatment systems: granular activated carbon (GAC), and ozone plus GAC treatment. Three main steps are involved: measurement of the social benefits, cost estimation of the two alternatives and the CBA.

The marginal willingness to pays (MWTPs) is estimated using three types of logit models (multinomial logit, random parameter logit and latent class logit). To detect the effectiveness of the treatments for mitigating hypothetical bias, dummies and interaction terms are included in the models and the coefficients of the variables are examined. After measuring the social benefits using MWTP, the cost of installing the two alternatives is estimated. While the mean MWTP is the correct measure to use from the standpoint of economic efficiency, the median WTP is probably the more appropriate measure to assist a democratic decision-making

process and can be considered a more cautious value to avoid hypothetical bias. Thus, the median values of WTP are also used for the CBA.

Concerning risk and uncertainty, sensitivity analyses are performed using several scenarios with the following factors: increase of discount rate, costs and construction period, and decrease of business life, benefits and beneficiaries. The worst case scenarios would likely be when the social benefits decrease to zero within the business life. In such a case, the three feasibility values cannot sustain the validity of the two alternatives.

In conclusion, the results of this research suggest that investment in the two advanced water treatment systems is feasible, but it depends on situations that may change in practice, such as reduction in the business life. The research also shows that prevention of water pollution can and should be a complementary approach for supplying safer and cleaner drinking tap water. Protecting the water catchment area along with the installation of the two advanced water treatment options should be considered for a more comprehensive and sustainable solution in the long run.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD))
Thesis advisor: Gschwandtner, Adelina
Uncontrolled keywords: Drinking Water Quality, Water Pollution, Protection of Catchment, Stated Choice Methods, Choice Experiments, Levels of Attributes, Experimental Design, Sample Size, Hypothetical Bias, Survey Methods, Random Parameter and Latent Class Logit, Willingness to Pay, Cost-Benefit Analysis, B/C ratio, Net Present Value, Internal Return Rate, Sensitivity analysis.
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Economics
SWORD Depositor: System Moodle
Depositing User: System Moodle
Date Deposited: 06 Apr 2018 10:10 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 20:26 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):


Downloads per month over past year