Skip to main content

Creativity vs quality: why the distinction matters when evaluating computational creativity systems

Jordanous, Anna (2018) Creativity vs quality: why the distinction matters when evaluating computational creativity systems. In: The 5th Computational Creativity Symposium at the AISB Convention 2018, 4-6 April 2018, Liverpool, UK. (KAR id:66563)

PDF (Paper will also be published on the AISB 2018 convention website by April 2018) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download (949kB) Preview
This file may not be suitable for user of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Official URL


The evaluation of computational creativity systems is increasingly becoming part of standard practice in computational creativity research, particularly with recent development in evaluation tools. One matter that can cause confusion, however, is in distinguishing between the concepts of creativity and quality/value. These two concepts are highly interrelated, to the point that it is difficult (and perhaps inappropriate) to define creativity without incorporat- ing quality judgements into that definition. Several examples exist, however, where creativity evaluation has been confused with quality judgments, leading to less grounded evaluative results. Many computational creativity projects aim to produce high quality results; this is a worthy research aim. If, however, the aim of a computational creativity research project is to make as creative a system as possible, then a more careful approach is needed that acknowledges and understands the differences - and also the overlaps - between creativity and quality. This paper critically investigates the concepts of creativity and quality (and how they are related). It offers warning examples showing the dangers of conflating the two concepts. These are followed by practical examples of how to incorporate value judgements into the evaluation of creativity of software, to further our overall pursuit of building more creative computational systems.

Item Type: Conference or workshop item (Paper)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Q Science > Q Science (General) > Q335 Artificial intelligence
Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA 76 Software, computer programming,
Divisions: Faculties > Sciences > School of Computing
Faculties > Sciences > School of Computing > Computational Intelligence Group
Faculties > Sciences > School of Computing > Data Science
Depositing User: Anna Jordanous
Date Deposited: 28 Mar 2018 09:23 UTC
Last Modified: 30 Jan 2020 22:08 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Jordanous, Anna:
  • Depositors only (login required):


Downloads per month over past year