Skip to main content

Preparation of large Stardust aluminum foil craters for analysis

Wozniakiewicz, Penelope J., Kearsley, Anton T., Burchell, Mark J., Price, Mark C., Ishii, Hope A., Cole, Michael J. (2018) Preparation of large Stardust aluminum foil craters for analysis. Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 53 (5). pp. 1066-1080. ISSN 1086-9379. (doi:10.1111/maps.13052?) (KAR id:66427)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download (1MB) Preview
[thumbnail of Wozniakiewicz_et_al-2018-Meteoritics_&_Planetary_Science.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13052?

Abstract

Over the last decade, silica aerogel tracks and aluminum foil craters on the Stardust collector have been studied extensively to determine the nature of captured

cometary dust grains. Analysis of particles captured in aerogel has been developed to a fine art, aided by sophisticated preparation techniques, and yielding revolutionary knowledge of comet dust mineralogy. The Stardust foil craters can be interpreted in terms of impacting particle size and structure, but almost all studies of composition for their contents have relied on in situ analysis techniques or relatively destructive extraction of materials. This has limited their examination and interpretation. However, numerous experimental hypervelocity impact studies under Stardust-Wild 2 encounter conditions have shown that abundant dust components are preserved in foil craters of all sizes. Using some of these analogue materials, we have previously shown that modern, nondestructive scanning

electron microscope imaging and X-ray microanalysis techniques can document distribution of dust remnants both quickly and thoroughly within foil craters prior to any preparation. Here we present findings from our efforts to quantify the amount of residue and demonstrate a simple method of crater shape modification which can bring material into positions where it is much more accessible for in situ analysis, or safe removal of small subsamples. We report that approximately 50% of silicate-dominated impactors were retained as impact crater residue; however, <3% of organic impactors remained in the craters after impact.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1111/maps.13052?
Subjects: Q Science > QB Astronomy
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Physics and Astronomy
Depositing User: Penelope Wozniakiewicz
Date Deposited: 15 Mar 2018 13:36 UTC
Last Modified: 03 Sep 2021 14:00 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/66427 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Wozniakiewicz, Penelope J.: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1441-4883
Burchell, Mark J.: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-8943
  • Depositors only (login required):