Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Data transparency regarding the implementation of European ‘no net loss’ biodiversity policies

Bull, Joseph W., Brauneder, Kerstin, Darbi, Marianne, Van Teeffelen, Astrid J.A., Quétier, Fabien, Brooks, Sharon E., Dunnett, Sebastian, Strange, Niels (2017) Data transparency regarding the implementation of European ‘no net loss’ biodiversity policies. Biological Conservation, 218 . pp. 64-72. ISSN 0006-3207. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.002) (KAR id:65764)


‘No net loss’ (NNL) conservation policies seek to address development impacts on biodiversity. There have been no peer-reviewed multinational assessments concerning the actual implementation of NNL policies to date. Such assessments would facilitate more informed debates on the validity of NNL for conservation, but assessing implementation requires data. Here, we explore data transparency concerning NNL implementation, with four European countries providing a case study.

Biodiversity offsets (offsets) are the most tangible outcome of NNL policy. Using an expert network to locate all offset datasets available within the public domain, we collated information on offset projects implemented in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Implementation data for offsets were found to be non-transparent, but the degree of transparency varies widely by country. We discuss barriers preventing data transparency — including a perceived lack of necessity, lack of common protocols for collecting data, and a lack of resources to do so. For the data we collected we find that most offsets in Europe: are not within protected areas; involve active restoration; and, compensate for infrastructure development. The area occupied by European offsets is at least of the order ~ 102 km2.

Transparent national NNL databases are essential for meeting good practice NNL principles, but are not currently available in Europe. We discuss what such databases might require to support evaluation of NNL policy effectiveness by researchers, the conservation community and policymakers.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.002
Uncontrolled keywords: Biodiversity offset; compensation; Europe; mitigation hierarchy; no net loss; 51 policy evaluation; data transparency.
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Joseph Bull
Date Deposited: 22 Jan 2018 09:54 UTC
Last Modified: 08 Dec 2022 11:02 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.