Skip to main content

Critical power: How different protocols and models affect its determination

Mattioni Maturana, Felipe, Fontana, Federico Y., Pogliaghi, Silvia, Passfield, Louis, Murias, Juan M. (2017) Critical power: How different protocols and models affect its determination. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 21 (7). P742-P747. ISSN 1440-2440. (doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.015) (KAR id:64941)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English


Download (414kB) Preview
[thumbnail of Final manuscript JSAMS-D-17-00540R2.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.015

Abstract

In cycling, critical power (CP) and work above CP (W’) can be estimated through linear and nonlinearmodels. Despite the concept of CP representing the upper boundary of sustainable exercise,

included TTE trials lasting less than 12 min. Conclusions: Estimations from CP3-hyp were found to be the most accurate, independently of TTE range. Models that include two trials between 12 and 20 min provide good agreement with the criterion method (for both CP and W’).

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.015
Uncontrolled keywords: power-time relationship; time-to-exhaustion; linear model; nonlinear model; exercise intensity domains
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > School of Sport and Exercise Sciences
Depositing User: Louis Passfield
Date Deposited: 01 Dec 2017 16:32 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 13:51 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/64941 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Passfield, Louis: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6223-162X
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year