Tax avoidance and benefit manipulation: Views on its morality and prevalence

Baumberg Geiger, Ben and Reeves, Aaron and de Vries, Robert (2017) Tax avoidance and benefit manipulation: Views on its morality and prevalence. NatCen (Full text available)

PDF
Download (2MB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/39196/bsa34_full...

Abstract

This chapter identifies a double standard in attitudes to tax avoidance and benefit manipulation: while around half or more regard both as wrong, benefit recipients are judged more harshly than tax offenders for what might be considered similar ‘offences’. This doublestandard varies across different groups: people in the highest income group and who are right-wing are less likely to say that tax avoidance is wrong, while people who hold liberal views are less likely to say that benefit manipulation is wrong. There has been a sudden drop in the perceived prevalence of benefit manipulation, which, if sustained, indicates a major shift in attitudes towards benefit claimants.

Item Type: Research report (external)
Uncontrolled keywords: benefit fraud; tax avoidance; benefits; social attitudes
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research
Depositing User: Robert de Vries
Date Deposited: 14 Oct 2017 16:27 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Oct 2017 15:49 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/64017 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Baumberg Geiger, Ben: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-3532
de Vries, Robert: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-836X
  • Depositors only (login required):