Skip to main content

Metacognitive variety, from Inner Mongolian Buddhism to Post-Truth

Mair, Jonathan (2018) Metacognitive variety, from Inner Mongolian Buddhism to Post-Truth. In: Proust, Joëlle and Fortier, Martin, eds. Metacognitive Diversity: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. ISBN 978-0-19-878971-0. (doi:10.1093/oso/9780198789710.003.0018) (KAR id:61777)

PDF Pre-print
Language: English
Download (255kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789710.003.00...

Abstract

In this chapter I present a case study based on ethnographic research carried out in Inner Mongolia, northern China. A Buddhist teacher and his students have subtly different metacognitive relationships to Buddhism and their practice and knowledge are dramatically different as a result. I offer this case study as an example of metacognitive variety, and argue that a similar approach is required to understand other cases in which people reflect, and attempt to act, on their own cognition and cognitive experience, including the transformations that have been described as 'post-truth'. In conclusion I make some methodological remarks about the study of metacognition through ethnography.

Item Type: Book section
DOI/Identification number: 10.1093/oso/9780198789710.003.0018
Uncontrolled keywords: belief, knowledge, cognition, metacognition, Buddhism, China, post-truth, anthropology
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > Social and Cultural Anthropology
Depositing User: Jonathan Mair
Date Deposited: 18 May 2017 19:10 UTC
Last Modified: 13 Jan 2020 12:14 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/61777 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Mair, Jonathan: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-3157
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year