Skip to main content

Are Asian cultures really less ageist than Western ones? It depends on the questions asked

Vauclair, Christin-Melanie, Hanke, Katja, Huang, Li-Li, Abrams, Dominic (2016) Are Asian cultures really less ageist than Western ones? It depends on the questions asked. International Journal of Psychology, 52 (2). pp. 136-144. ISSN 0020-7594. E-ISSN 1464-066X. (doi:10.1002/ijop.12292) (KAR id:61358)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Download (183kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12292

Abstract

Ageism is an increasing concern in ageing populations such as Asia and Europe. A prevalent assumption in psychology is that Eastern cultures may be less prone to ageism because of norms and values that honour and respect elders. Yet, evidence for this culture hypothesis is inconclusive. The current study examines this issue by comparing attitudes towards older people in an Eastern and Western samples of 184 young people from the UK and 249 from Taiwan. Attitudes to old age were measured both as meta-perceptions (the perceived normative context) and personal attitudes in regard to the cognitive, affective and behavioural components of ageism. Consistent with the culture hypothesis, meta-perceptions about competence and admiration were more positive in Taiwan than in the UK, yet other meta-perceptions were more negative pointing to the existence of old age subtypes. Personal attitudes about older people in regard to the affective and behavioural, but not the cognitive component, were more negative in Taiwan than in the UK. Thus, cultural differences in ageism are more nuanced than suggested by previous research. The importance of distinguishing between the normative context and personal attitudes as well as the different components of ageism is highlighted by the present findings.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1002/ijop.12292
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology > Centre for the Study of Group Processes
Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Dominic Abrams
Date Deposited: 18 Apr 2017 09:10 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 18:57 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/61358 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Abrams, Dominic: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-4572
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year