Metacognition, Mindreading, and the Hypercorrection Effect in ASD

Williams, David M., Nicholson, T, Carruthers, P, Bergström, Zara M (2016) Metacognition, Mindreading, and the Hypercorrection Effect in ASD. In: International Meeting for Autism Research, May 2017. (doi:10.1177/1362361316680178) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316680178

Abstract

Among neurotypical adults, errors made with high confidence (i.e. errors a person strongly believed they would not make) are corrected more reliably than errors made with low confidence. This ‘hypercorrection effect’ is thought to result from enhanced attention to information that reflects a ‘metacognitive mismatch’ between one’s beliefs and reality. In Experiment 1, we employed a standard measure of this effect. Participants answered general knowledge questions and provided confidence judgements about how likely each answer was to be correct, after which feedback was given. Finally, participants were retested on all questions answered incorrectly during the initial phase. Mindreading ability and autism spectrum disorder–like traits were measured. We found that a representative sample of (n?=?83) neurotypical participants made accurate confidence judgements (reflecting good metacognition) and showed the hypercorrection effect. Mindreading ability was associated with autism spectrum disorder–like traits and metacognition. However, the hypercorrection effect was non-significantly associated with mindreading or autism spectrum disorder–like traits. In Experiment 2, 11 children with autism spectrum disorder and 11 matched comparison participants completed the hypercorrection task. Although autism spectrum disorder children showed significantly diminished metacognitive ability, they showed an undiminished hypercorrection effect. The evidence in favour of an undiminished hypercorrection effect (null result) was moderate, according to Bayesian analysis (Bayes factor?=?0.21).

Item Type: Conference or workshop item (Paper)
DOI/Identification number: 10.1177/1362361316680178
Uncontrolled keywords: autism, hypercorrection, mentalising, metacognition, mindreading
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Psychology > Developmental Psychology
Depositing User: David Williams
Date Deposited: 11 Dec 2016 19:32 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 18:27 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/59600 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):