Skip to main content

Supporting shared decision-making for older people with multiple heath and social care needs: a protocol for a realist synthesis to inform integrated care models

Bunn, Frances, Goodman, Claire M., Manthorpe, Jill, Durand, Marie-Anne, Hodkinson, Isabel, Rait, Greta, Millac, Paul, Davies, Sue L., Russell, Bridget, Wilson, Patricia M. and others. (2017) Supporting shared decision-making for older people with multiple heath and social care needs: a protocol for a realist synthesis to inform integrated care models. BMJ Open, 7 . Article Number e014026. ISSN 2044-6055. E-ISSN 014026. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014026) (KAR id:59048)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Download (519kB) Preview
[thumbnail of Bunn et al 2017 SDM.pdf]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL:


Introduction: Including the patient or user perspective is a central organising principle of integrated care. Moreover, there is increasing recognition of the importance of strengthening relationships among patients, carers and practitioners, particularly for individuals receiving substantial health and care support, such as those with long-term or multiple conditions. The overall aims of this synthesis are to provide a context-relevant understanding of how models to facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) might work for older people with multiple health and care needs, and how they might be applied to integrated care models. Methods: and analysis The synthesis draws on the principles of realist inquiry, to explain how, in what contexts and for whom, interventions that aim to strengthen SDM among older patients, carers and practitioners are effective. We will use an iterative, stakeholder-driven, three-phase approach. Phase 1: development of programme theory/theories that will be tested through a first scoping of the literature and consultation with key stakeholder groups; phase 2: systematic searches of the evidence to test and develop the theories identified in phase 1; phase 3: validation of programme theory/theories with a purposive sample of participants from phase 1. The synthesis will draw on prevailing theories such as candidacy, self-efficacy, personalisation and coproduction. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval for the stakeholder interviews was obtained from the University of Hertfordshire ECDA (Ethics Committee with Delegated Authority), reference number HSK/SF/UH/02387. The propositions arising from this review will be used to develop recommendations about how to tailor SDM interventions to older people with complex health and social care needs in an integrated care setting.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014026
Uncontrolled keywords: older people; Shared decision making; long term conditions; multimorbidity; realist synthesis
Subjects: H Social Sciences
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies
Depositing User: Patricia Wilson
Date Deposited: 16 Feb 2017 13:52 UTC
Last Modified: 29 Oct 2021 14:37 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Wilson, Patricia M.:
  • Depositors only (login required):


Downloads per month over past year