Dennis, Emily B., Freeman, Stephen N., Brereton, Tom, Roy, David B. (2013) Indexing butterfly abundance whilst accounting for missing counts and variability in seasonal pattern. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4 (7). pp. 637-645. (doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12053) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:57932)
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
|
Official URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2041-21... |
Abstract
1. Volunteer-based ‘citizen science’ schemes now play a valuable role in deriving biodiversity indicators, both
aiding the development of conservation policies and measuring the success of management. We provide a new
method for analysing such data based on counts of invertebrate species characterised by highly variable numbers
within a season combined with a substantial proportion of proposed survey visits not made.
2. Using the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (UKBMS) for illustration, we propose a two-stage model that
makesmore efficient use of the data than previous analyses, whilst accounting for missing values. Firstly, generalised
additive models were applied separately to data from each year to estimate the annual seasonal flight patterns.
The estimated daily values were then normalised to estimate a seasonal pattern that is the same across sites
but differs between years. A model was then fitted to the full set of annual counts, with seasonal values as an offset,
to estimate annual changes in abundance accounting for the varying seasonality.
3. The method was tested and compared against the current approach and a simple linear interpolation using
simulated data, parameterised with values estimated from UKBMS data for three example species. The simulation
study demonstrated accurate estimation of linear time trends and improved power for detecting trends compared with
the current model.
4. Comparison of indices for species covered by the UKBMS under the various model approaches showed similar
predicted trends over time, but confidence intervals were generally narrower for the two-stage model.
5. In addition to creating more robust trend estimates, the new method allows all volunteer records to contribute
to the indices and thus incorporates data from more populations within the geographical range of a species. On
average, the current model only enables data from 60% of 10 km2 grid squares with monitored sites to be
included, whereas the two-stage model uses all available data and hence provides full coverage at least of the
monitored area. As many invertebrate species exhibit similar patterns of emergence or voltinism, our two-stage
method could be applied to other taxa.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/2041-210X.12053 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | butterfly monitoring, citizen science, count data, generalised additive models, missing data |
Subjects: |
Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA276 Mathematical statistics Q Science > QH Natural history > QH541 Ecology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science |
Depositing User: | Emily Dennis |
Date Deposited: | 18 Oct 2016 10:16 UTC |
Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2021 10:23 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/57932 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):