New genetic and morphological evidence suggests a single hoaxer created 'Piltdown man'

De Groote, Isabelle, Flink, Linus G, Abbas, Rizwaan, Bello, Silvia M, Burgio, Lucia, Buck, Laura T, Dean, Christopher, Freyne, Alison, Higham, Thomas, Jones, Chris G, and others. (2016) New genetic and morphological evidence suggests a single hoaxer created 'Piltdown man'. Royal Society open science, 3 . p. 160328. ISSN 2054-5703. (doi:10.1098/rsos.160328)

PDF - Publisher pdf

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Download (692kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160328

Abstract

In 1912, palaeontologist Arthur Smith Woodward and amateur antiquarian and solicitor Charles Dawson announced the discovery of a fossil that supposedly provided a link between apes and humans: Eoanthropus dawsoni (Dawson's dawn man). The publication generated huge interest from scientists and the general public. However, ‘Piltdown man's’ initial celebrity has long been overshadowed by its subsequent infamy as one of the most famous scientific frauds in history. Our re-evaluation of the Piltdown fossils using the latest scientific methods (DNA analyses, high-precision measurements, spectroscopy and virtual anthropology) shows that it is highly likely that a single orang-utan specimen and at least two human specimens were used to create the fake fossils. The modus operandi was found consistent throughout the assemblage (specimens are stained brown, loaded with gravel fragments and restored using filling materials), linking all specimens from the Piltdown I and Piltdown II sites to a single forger—Charles Dawson. Whether Dawson acted alone is uncertain, but his hunger for acclaim may have driven him to risk his reputation and misdirect the course of anthropology for decades. The Piltdown hoax stands as a cautionary tale to scientists not to be led by preconceived ideas, but to use scientific integrity and rigour in the face of novel discoveries.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1098/rsos.160328
Subjects: Q Science
Q Science > QH Natural history
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation
Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > Biological Anthropology
Depositing User: Matthew Skinner
Date Deposited: 10 Aug 2016 08:44 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 17:42 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/56777 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year