Rutherford, Brian A. (2016) A response to Stone and Parker. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13 (1). pp. 90-91. ISSN 1176-6093. (doi:10.1108/QRAM-01-2016-0007) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:56287)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication) | |
| Official URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-01-2016-0007 |
Abstract
Purpose – To respond to the comment by Stone and Parker on my paper “The struggle to fabricate
Design/methodology/approach – The paper responds to issues highlighted by Stone and Parker.
that we bring our skills and experience as accountants directly to bear on narratives, to analyse and
that will, at least according to some definitions, be subjective but perhaps no more subjective than
accessibility.
on accounting narratives
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1108/QRAM-01-2016-0007 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | Flesch formula, Readability, Reader accessibility, Supplementary measures |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting |
| Divisions: | Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School > Accounting and Finance |
| Depositing User: | B. Rutherford |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Jul 2016 14:40 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 29 May 2019 17:34 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/56287 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Altmetric
Altmetric