Skip to main content

A response to Stone and Parker

Rutherford, Brian A. (2016) A response to Stone and Parker. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13 (1). pp. 90-91. ISSN 1176-6093. (doi:10.1108/QRAM-01-2016-0007) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:56287)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-01-2016-0007

Abstract

Purpose – To respond to the comment by Stone and Parker on my paper “The struggle to fabricate

Design/methodology/approach – The paper responds to issues highlighted by Stone and Parker.

that we bring our skills and experience as accountants directly to bear on narratives, to analyse and

that will, at least according to some definitions, be subjective but perhaps no more subjective than

accessibility.

on accounting narratives

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1108/QRAM-01-2016-0007
Uncontrolled keywords: Flesch formula, Readability, Reader accessibility, Supplementary measures
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School > Accounting and Finance
Depositing User: Brian Rutherford
Date Deposited: 13 Jul 2016 14:40 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 17:34 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/56287 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):