Rethinking Conjugality as the Basis for Family Recognition: A Feminist Rewriting of the Judgment in Burden v. United Kingdom

Barker, Nicola J. (2016) Rethinking Conjugality as the Basis for Family Recognition: A Feminist Rewriting of the Judgment in Burden v. United Kingdom. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 6 (6). ISSN 2079-5971. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/73...

Abstract

In Burden v. UK, elderly cohabiting sisters unsuccessfully challenged their exclusion from civil partnerships. They claimed this exclusion was a violation of the prohibition of discrimination (Article 14) and the right to peaceful enjoyment of property (Article 1 of Protocol 1) under the European Convention on Human Rights because the surviving sister would be liable to pay inheritance tax whereas a lesbian couple could avoid this liability by registering a civil partnership. The facts of the case and the judgments by both the Chamber and Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights raise interesting questions about the extent to which it is justifiable to base legal protections on conjugality. In this paper, I will explore these questions and consider how the judgment could be rewritten from a feminist perspective.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: K Law
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Law School
Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Law School > Centre for Law, Gender and Sexuality
Depositing User: Nicola Barker
Date Deposited: 10 Jun 2016 14:40 UTC
Last Modified: 17 Oct 2017 12:21 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/55875 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):