Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

The doctrine of the 'responsibility to protect' as a practice of political exceptionalism

Cunliffe, Philip (2017) The doctrine of the 'responsibility to protect' as a practice of political exceptionalism. European Journal of International Relations, 23 (2). pp. 466-486. ISSN 1354-0661. E-ISSN 1460-3713. (doi:10.1177/1354066116654956) (KAR id:55842)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
[thumbnail of Paper EJIR inc bibliography Version II without Track Changes.pdf]
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Microsoft Word Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of Anonymous Submission Paper EJIR inc bibliography Version II without Track Changes.doc]
Official URL:


The consensus on the doctrine of the ‘responsibility to protect’ has replaced ideas of humanitarian intervention with a new vision of the responsibilities that states have to protect their peoples from the most egregious suffering. The contention of this article is that this is a politics of exceptionalism, whereby power is legitimated by reference to its effectiveness in responding to emergency or crisis. By analysing the doctrine in this way, new light is shed on the debate surrounding the responsibility to protect. First, understanding the doctrine in terms of exceptionalism helps explain the paradox of how the doctrine has been assimilated so readily into institutional and state practice without manifesting any greater commitment to international intervention. Second, understanding these new security practices in terms of exceptionalism allows us to move beyond questions of imperialism. Once understood in terms of exceptionalism, it can be shown that the stakes in the debate on the responsibility to protect are restricted not only to relations between states, but also to relations within them:

principles of representative government are to be substituted with paternalist and authoritarian visions of state power.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1177/1354066116654956
Uncontrolled keywords: Humanitarianism, human rights, International Relations, liberalism, responsibility to protect, sovereignty
Subjects: J Political Science > JC Political theory
J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations
Depositing User: Philip Cunliffe
Date Deposited: 07 Jun 2016 15:58 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2024 16:37 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.