Skip to main content

The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study

Baumberg Geiger, Ben (2015) The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study. Journal of Social Policy, 45 (2). pp. 181-199. ISSN 0047-2794. E-ISSN 1469-7823. (doi:10.1017/S0047279415000525) (KAR id:55433)

PDF (The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download (907kB) Preview
[thumbnail of The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Microsoft Word (The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[thumbnail of The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study]
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279415000525

Abstract

Stigma has long been viewed by some as essential to discourage excessive claims, yet seen by others as a cause of non-take-up by people in need and as a form of symbolic violence. More recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in the links between shame and poverty (including the role of benefits), and particular concerns about media/political rhetoric in the UK. Yet while our knowledge of benefits stigma has been enhanced by theoretical/qualitative contributions, few quantitative studies examine its extent or patterning. This paper therefore reports the results of a 2012 nationally-representative survey in the UK. It finds sub-types of stigma are reported by 10–19 per cent for each benefit, but 34 per cent report either personal stigma (their own view) or stigmatisation (perceived stigma by others) for at least one benefit, and over one-quarter say a stigma-related reason would make them less likely to claim. One-third of claimants themselves report some degree of stigma around their claim. Against the predictions of ‘dependency culture’ claims, however, respondents in high-claim areas were more likely to stigmatise benefits, both before and after accounting for other factors. The paper concludes by considering lessons for future benefits stigma studies, and policy options to reduce benefits stigma.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1017/S0047279415000525
Uncontrolled keywords: Benefits; social security; welfare; stigma; shame; take-up; survey
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research
Depositing User: Lisa Towers
Date Deposited: 16 May 2016 09:53 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2021 13:34 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/55433 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Baumberg Geiger, Ben: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-3532
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year