Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Unpacking the People–Biodiversity Paradox: A Conceptual Framework

Pett, Tristan J., Shwartz, Assaf, Irvine, Katherine N., Dallimer, Martin, Davies, Zoe G. (2016) Unpacking the People–Biodiversity Paradox: A Conceptual Framework. Bioscience, 66 (7). pp. 576-583. ISSN 0006-3568. E-ISSN 1525-3244. (doi:10.1093/biosci/biw036) (KAR id:55128)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
[thumbnail of Pett et al. (Revised Version).pdf]
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Pett et al. BioScience 2016.pdf]
Official URL:


Global phenomena, including urbanization, agricultural intensification, and biotic homogenization, have led to extensive ecosystem degradation, species extinctions, and, consequently, a reduction in biodiversity. However, although it is now widely asserted in the research, policy, and practice arenas that interacting with nature is fundamental to human health and well-being, there is a paucity of nuanced evidence characterizing how the living components of nature, biodiversity, play a role in this accepted truth. Understanding these human–biodiversity

relationships is essential if the conservation agenda is to be aligned successfully with that of public health by policymakers and practitioners. Here, we show that an apparent “people–biodiversity paradox” is emerging from the literature, comprising a mismatch between (a) people’s biodiversity preferences and how these inclinations relate to personal subjective well-being and (b) the limited ability of individuals to accurately perceive the biodiversity surrounding them. In addition, we present a conceptual framework for understanding the complexity underpinning human–biodiversity interactions.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1093/biosci/biw036
Uncontrolled keywords: conservation biology, cultural ecosystem services, green space, human well-being, nature
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Anthropology and Conservation > DICE (Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology)
Depositing User: Zoe Davies
Date Deposited: 22 Apr 2016 16:13 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Jul 2023 13:20 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.