Skip to main content

The Law of Persons Today: At the Margins of Jurisprudence

Mussawir, Edward, Parsley, Connal (2017) The Law of Persons Today: At the Margins of Jurisprudence. Law and Humanities, 11 (1). pp. 44-63. ISSN 1752-1483. E-ISSN 1752-1491. (doi:10.1080/17521483.2017.1320041)

MS Office Open XML (OOXML) - Author's Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication Download (66kB)
[img]
PDF - Author's Accepted Manuscript
Download (695kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2017.1320041

Abstract

Recent decisions have given legal identity to rivers such as Te Awa Tupua in New Zealand, and the Ganges and Yamuna in India, effectively treating them as having all the rights, duties and liabilities of a legal person. Looking at such cases, in which the enduring fiction of the legal person is extended over an increasingly wide range of referents, we are reminded that this fiction is anything but marginal – especially in the law of any jurisdiction influenced, however indirectly, by Roman jurisprudence. This paper begins from the point of view that the anthropological embedding of the juridical person ought not to be anachronistically attributed to the Roman ‘law of persons’ in which its craft originated. Rather, we suggest, the well-known Christian metaphysicalization of the juridical person as a moral entity not only adds to but also transforms and displaces that law as a juristic enterprise. What is marginalized in this sense is in fact Roman law's discrete and self-conscious techniques of shaping the legal person. This chapter aims not just to highlight the familiar fate of the person under the influence of church doctrine, but also to draw a contemporary inspiration – and, more cautiously, a critical potential – from a return to a casuistic, concrete and immanent conception of the jurisprudential art of crafting the person. Rather than argue for the inclusion of excluded identities within law's categories (thus extending such categories but doing nothing to challenge the often heteronormative construction of the identities it encompasses), this chapter asks what would it mean to return to an ‘experimental’ law of persons (or a ‘profaned’ art of fashioning the person, in Giorgio Agamben's sense)? Might this eventually be a path by which to liberate juristic technique to new uses?

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/17521483.2017.1320041
Uncontrolled keywords: Legal person, legal fiction, jurisprudence, juristic art, Roman law
Subjects: A General Works > AZ History of Scholarship. The Humanities
K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Law School
Depositing User: Connal Parsley
Date Deposited: 14 Dec 2015 11:33 UTC
Last Modified: 23 Jan 2020 04:11 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/53355 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Parsley, Connal: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5425-2236
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year