Singisetti, Kiran, Muthumayandi, Karthikeyan, Abual-Rub, Zaid, Weir, David (2015) Navigation-assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1 and 2 years. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 135 (11). pp. 1595-1601. ISSN 1434-3916. (doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2314-7) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:50346)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
|
Official URL: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2314-7 |
Abstract
Introduction: Navigation technique for total knee replacement has been shown to improve accuracy of prosthesis alignment in several studies. The purpose was to compare the patient-reported outcome measures in primary total knee replacement (TKR) using navigation versus conventional surgical technique at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected patient-reported outcome data for 351 consecutively performed primary TKR was included in the study. The study group (N = 113) included patients who had Triathlon TKR using articular surface mounted (ASM Stryker®) navigation technique and control group (N = 238) included patients who had Triathlon TKR using conventional jig. In addition to the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) and SF-36 (Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form-36), a short self-report questionnaire evaluating the level of satisfaction, quality of life and whether patients would undergo knee replacement again. Results: WOMAC: no significant difference between the groups was noted in mean WOMAC pain, function and stiffness scores at 1- and 2-year follow-up. SF-36: no significant difference between the groups was seen except in the physical function component of score at 1 year (p = 0.019). Navigation group mean 56.78 (CI 51.06–62.5) versus conventional group mean 48.34 (44.68–52.01) but this difference was not observed at 2-year follow-up. Conclusions: The overall patient-reported outcome scores improved after total knee replacement but appear to be comparable in both groups at 1- and 2-year follow-up.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s00402-015-2314-7 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Functional outcome Patient-reported outcomes Total knee replacement Navigation Conventional |
Subjects: |
R Medicine R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Natural Sciences > Sport and Exercise Sciences |
Depositing User: | Karthikeyan Muthumayandi |
Date Deposited: | 03 Oct 2016 07:30 UTC |
Last Modified: | 17 Aug 2022 10:59 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/50346 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):