Skip to main content

The dancing God. One Monotheism, two doctrines. Giorgio Agamben, Roberto Esposito, and Davide Tarizzo on the philosophy of biopolitics

Piasentier, Marco (2015) The dancing God. One Monotheism, two doctrines. Giorgio Agamben, Roberto Esposito, and Davide Tarizzo on the philosophy of biopolitics. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:48035)

PDF
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this Publication
[img]

Abstract

In this thesis, I propose a theoretical framework to understand the process of secularization produced by the revolutions of language and life. Thanks to the linguistic turn it has discovered that knowledge is kept within language. As Agamben explains, the Copernican revolution of language has made us “the first human beings who have become completely conscious of language. For the first time, what preceding generations called God, Being, spirit, unconscious appear to us as what they are: names for language. This is why for us, any philosophy, any religion, or any knowledge that has not become conscious of this turn belongs irrevocably to the past”(Agamben, 2005a: 45). Thanks to the vitalist turn, modern thought has found out that human beings are natural beings and, in spite of the peculiarity of their characteristics, their origin is the result of the natural process of evolution.

In La vita. Un’invezione recente, the Italian philosopher Davide Tarizzo argues that before modernity human beings did not exist “in the sense that the question of the humanity of man was not being asked, nor was there any ‘analysis of finitude’ in which ‘man’s being is always maintained, in relation to man himself, in a remoteness and a distance that constitute him”(Tarizzo, 2011: 53). Modernity becomes the process of secularization whereby the human being no longer measures himself against God, but becomes the measure of himself. The human being himself is the subject and the object of his own inquiry.

In order to let emerge the fracture between the linguistic and the vitalist turns, I will address the question of the philosophy of biopolitics. Biopolitics is the discipline aimed at envisioning a politics able to give voice to the nature of the human being. Before proposing a biopolitical account it is therefore necessary to answer the philosophical question concerning the definition of the human being. I will claim that the fracture between the linguistic and the vitalist turn in defining what it means to be human is the source of modern monotheism.

I will enquiry the linguistic and vitalist approach to the philosophy of biopolitics through the analysis of the work of three contemporary Italian philosophers: Giorgio Agamben, Roberto Esposito, and Davide Tarizzo. The decision to focus on Italian biopolitical theory is determined by the conviction that this philosophical approach offers one of the clearest and best-articulated insights into the fracture between life and language.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD))
Uncontrolled keywords: Italian studies and philosophy
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
P Language and Literature > PC Romance philology and languages
Divisions: Faculties > Humanities > School of European Culture and Languages
Depositing User: Users 1 not found.
Date Deposited: 22 Apr 2015 15:00 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 14:26 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/48035 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year