Chang, Li-cheng (2012) Cost-effectiveness and fairness in health care: NICE appraisals. Public Money & Management, 32 (5). pp. 343-348. ISSN 0954-0962. (doi:10.1080/09540962.2012.703418) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:45980)
PDF (Restricted due to publisher copyright policy)
Publisher pdf
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
![]() |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2012.703418 |
Abstract
Appraisals by the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) examine clinical and cost-effectiveness to determine whether medical interventions should be publicly funded by the National Health Service (NHS). NICE's evaluations are attracting increasing debate about the tension between efficiency and equity. This article, using the case of renal cell cancer, argues that NICE is not only concerned with maximized aggregate welfare, but also with its social obligations to protect the less advantaged members of society. The English experience is likely to have international implications in terms of evaluating the benefits of new medical treatments.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1080/09540962.2012.703418 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Cost-effectiveness, NICE, NHS, QALY |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance |
Divisions: | Divisions > Kent Business School - Division > Department of Accounting and Finance |
Depositing User: | Li-cheng Chang |
Date Deposited: | 11 Dec 2014 17:03 UTC |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2024 10:29 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/45980 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):