Skip to main content

Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement

Lingard, EA, Muthumayandi, Karthikeyan, Holland, JP (2009) Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, 91 (12). pp. 1550-1554. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:45819)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)

Abstract

This study compared the demographic, clinical and patient-reported outcomes after total

surgeon. Patients completed a questionnaire that included the WOMAC, SF-36 scores and

outcome scores were adjusted for age, gender, comorbid conditions and, at one year, for the

a BHR were significantly younger (49 vs 67 years, p < 0.0001), more likely to be male (68% vs

operation there was no difference in WOMAC and SF-36 scores, except for function, in which

At one year patients with a BHR reported significantly better WOMAC pain scores (p =

greater improvement in general health compared with those with a THR.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: Hip resurfacing, Hip replacement, patients reported outcome
Subjects: R Medicine > RD Surgery
Divisions: Faculties > Sciences > School of Sport and Exercise Sciences
Depositing User: Karthikeyan Muthumayandi
Date Deposited: 03 Oct 2016 07:45 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 13:51 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/45819 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Muthumayandi, Karthikeyan: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-0452
  • Depositors only (login required):