Skip to main content

Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas

Kerr, Norbert L., Kaufman-Gilliland, Cynthia M. (1994) Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (3). pp. 513-529. ISSN 0022-3514. E-ISSN 1939-1315. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.513) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:41332)

PDF (Restricted due to publisher copyright policies) Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Restricted due to publisher copyright policies]
Official URL


Intragroup communication promotes cooperation in social dilemmas. Two explanations are plausible: discussion may (1) enhance feelings of group identity or (2) induce commitments to cooperate. Some remedies for social dilemmas (like group communication) may be subclassified as public welfare remedies (of which enhanced group identity is an example) vs cooperation-contingent remedies (of which commitment is an example). The efficacy of a cooperative act for enhancing the collective welfare should moderate remedies of the former but not the latter type. An experiment, using 441 female undergraduates, is reported in which group communication and the efficacy of cooperation were manipulated. As expected if communication induced commitments, but contrary to the group identity explanation, efficacy did not moderate the effect of group discussion. Other analyses provided more direct evidence that group members made and honored commitments to cooperate.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.513
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: Norbert Kerr
Date Deposited: 07 Jun 2014 22:07 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:16 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):