Skip to main content

Personal Budgets, Choice and Health – a review of international evidence from 11 OECD countries: A Review of International Evidence from 11 OECD Countries

Gadsby, Erica W., Segar, Julia, Allen, Pauline, Checkland, Kath, Coleman, Anna, Mcdermott, Imelda, Peckham, Stephen (2013) Personal Budgets, Choice and Health – a review of international evidence from 11 OECD countries: A Review of International Evidence from 11 OECD Countries. International Journal of Public and Private Health care Management and Economics, 3 (3). pp. 15-28. ISSN 2155-6423. E-ISSN 2155-6431. (doi:10.4018/ijpphme.2013070102)

Abstract

Personal or individual budgets for purchasing health and social care are intended to offer more choice, control and flexibility to service users when compared with agency-directed care. They are becoming an increasingly common feature in high-income countries for purchasing personal care that often lies on the border line between health and social care. In England, they have recently been introduced explicitly for the purchasing of health care. There are some key motivations behind their introduction: they are expected to give individuals more choice about care they receive; to expand options for care; to improve outcomes; and to reduce expenditure. This paper draws from a review of the international evidence on personal budgets which identified: descriptive detail on personal budget schemes in 11 OECD countries to examine their key features and implementation processes; empirical evidence on the experiences of, and outcomes for, people using these schemes, and; empirical evidence regarding the impact of the schemes on the healthcare system, particularly with regards to resources. The paper examines the motivating factors behind personal budget schemes in light of this evidence. It concludes that there is little in the evidence to suggest that international governments’ expectations for personal budget programmes are well-founded. The assumptions that they improve choice, and that more choice will in turn lead to greater autonomy and then improved outcomes at lower cost, are actually far more complex and generally unsupported by evidence.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.4018/ijpphme.2013070102
Uncontrolled keywords: Cash-For-Care, Health Policy, Patient Choice, Personal Budgets, Personalisation
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HG Finance
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies
Depositing User: Tony Rees
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2014 12:50 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 12:39 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/41307 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Peckham, Stephen: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7002-2614
  • Depositors only (login required):

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year