How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales

Calnan, Michael .W., Montaner, David, Horne, Robert (2005) How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales. Social Science and Medicine, 60 (9). pp. 1937-1948. ISSN 0277-9536. (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.058) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.058

Abstract

There has been a continuing debate about the extent to which the public finds health-care technological innovation acceptable. The public's ambivalence about scientific medicine may have been exacerbated, more recently, by developments such as the introduction of the 'new genetics' with their associated ethical and social implications and the claims that public trust in health care and practitioners and, more widely, in society has been eroded. The aim of this paper is to examine public attitudes to a range of innovative health-care technologies to see whether (i) certain technologies are perceived as particularly problematic, and (ii) attitudes to new health-care technologies are associated more broadly with beliefs about science, trust in health care and social trust, and perceptions of the benefits and risks of complementary and alternative medicine versus orthodox (technological) medicine. These questions are examined through a statistical analysis of data collected in a national, postal survey of the adult population (n=1187) in England and Wales. The results showed public ambivalence about new health-care technologies, although genetic technologies, as a whole, were not seen to be problematic and their acceptability depended on their ability to control serious diseases. However, there was a level of consistency in attitude across the different technologies. Those consistently against new health-care technologies were also more likely to be suspicious of science, and doubtful about the benefits of other established, orthodox technologies (screening; medications) and to have less trust in health and health-care practitioners.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.058
Uncontrolled keywords: Genetics, New technologies, Public attitudes, Trust, UK
Subjects: H Social Sciences
R Medicine
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research
Depositing User: Mita Mondal
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2014 15:03 UTC
Last Modified: 29 May 2019 11:59 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/38746 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):