Three ways to defend social security in Britain

Baumberg Geiger, Ben (2012) Three ways to defend social security in Britain. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 20 (2). pp. 149-161. ISSN 1759-8273 . (doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/175982712X652050) (Full text available)

PDF - Author's Accepted Manuscript
Download (288kB) Preview
[img]
Preview
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/175982712X652050

Abstract

British social security is now in a time of crisis, where cuts are being made to a system that was already struggling to provide decent security. In this paper I argue that successful proposals to combat this must (i) lead to reductions in poverty/inequality; (ii) fit existing perceptions of claimant 'deservingness'; and (iii) change deservingness perceptions in the long run. I conclude that three influential recent proposals - 'Decent Childhoods', 'National Salary Insurance', and 'The Solidarity Society' - are only partially successful in meeting these criteria, and that successful reform requires a fusion of the respective insights of each proposal.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled keywords: Inequality, Institutions, Public attitudes, Social security, Universalism
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Divisions: Faculties > Social Sciences > School of Social Policy Sociology and Social Research
Depositing User: Mita Mondal
Date Deposited: 14 Nov 2013 09:37 UTC
Last Modified: 18 Sep 2017 15:51 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/36349 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Baumberg Geiger, Ben: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-3532
  • Depositors only (login required):