Skip to main content

Three ways to defend social security in Britain

Baumberg Geiger, Ben (2012) Three ways to defend social security in Britain. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 20 (2). pp. 149-161. ISSN 1759-8273. (doi:10.1332/175982712X652050) (KAR id:36349)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download (288kB) Preview
[thumbnail of 2012 JPSJ post-print_ three ways to defend.pdf]
Preview
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/175982712X652050

Abstract

British social security is now in a time of crisis, where cuts are being made to a system that was already struggling to provide decent security. In this paper I argue that successful proposals to combat this must (i) lead to reductions in poverty/inequality; (ii) fit existing perceptions of claimant 'deservingness'; and (iii) change deservingness perceptions in the long run. I conclude that three influential recent proposals - 'Decent Childhoods', 'National Salary Insurance', and 'The Solidarity Society' - are only partially successful in meeting these criteria, and that successful reform requires a fusion of the respective insights of each proposal.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1332/175982712X652050
Uncontrolled keywords: Inequality, Institutions, Public attitudes, Social security, Universalism
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Divisions: Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research
Depositing User: Mita Mondal
Date Deposited: 14 Nov 2013 09:37 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 10:13 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/36349 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Baumberg Geiger, Ben: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-3532
  • Depositors only (login required):