Rutherford, Brian A. (2013) A Pragmatist Defence of Classical Financial Accounting Research. Abacus, 49 (2). pp. 197-218. ISSN 0001-3072. (doi:10.1111/abac.12003) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:34221)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication) | |
| Official URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/abac.12003 |
Abstract
One reason for the disdain in which classical financial accounting research
insufficiently scientific nature. While many have defended classical research
paper is different. It offers an epistemologically robust underpinning for the
restores its claim to legitimacy as a rigorous, systematic and empirically
from classical philosophical pragmatism and, principally, from the writings
capable of yielding serviceable, theoretically based solutions to problems in
accounting practice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/abac.12003 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | Accounting practice; Classical accounting research; Epistemology; John Dewey; Pragmatism. |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting |
| Divisions: | Faculties > Social Sciences > Kent Business School > Accounting and Finance |
| Depositing User: | B. Rutherford |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Jun 2013 11:48 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 29 May 2019 10:16 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/34221 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Altmetric
Altmetric