Alaszewski, Andy (2000) Professional judgement and risk: process or outcome? Community Care Collaboration, . pp. 2-3. (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:25504)
| The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. |
Abstract
In the wake of the Bristol disater the Government proposes to make Chief Executives of NHS Trusts accountable to Parliament for the quality of decisions made by doctors, nurses and other health professionals through the process of clinical governance. However, the precise nature and meaning of clinical governance not only failed to define it but placed it alongside professional self-regulation without specifying how and in what ways the two processes were linked.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional information: | NHS Executive Northern and Yorkshire, R&D Portfolio Programme at the Nuffield Institute for Health |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | clinical governance, health professionals, risk, |
| Subjects: |
R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
| Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research > Centre for Health Services Studies |
| Depositing User: | Tony Rees |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Sep 2010 09:57 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 05 Dec 2023 04:04 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/25504 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
University of Kent Author Information
Alaszewski, Andy.
| Creator's ORCID: |
 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6312-7306
|
|---|---|
| CReDIT Contributor Roles: |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):
Download Statistics
Download Statistics
