Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Doctor-patient communication and outcome in cancer patients: An intervention

Rutter, Derek R., Iconomou, G., Quine, Lyn (1996) Doctor-patient communication and outcome in cancer patients: An intervention. Psychology & Health, 12 (1). pp. 57-71. ISSN 0887-0446. (doi:10.1080/08870449608406922) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:18775)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870449608406922

Abstract

Previous research suggests that the way in which doctors communicate with their patients has significant effects upon outcomes: ''soft'' outcomes such as satisfaction and compliance with treatment regimes; and ''hard'' outcomes such as need for analgesics and length of stay in hospital after surgical operations. The present investigation is concerned with cancer patients and tests whether providing oncologists with additional training in communication may promote patients' coping, quality of Life and even survival. In the first part of the investigation, seventy-three patients at the University Hospital of Patras in Greece were followed for a year from the time of diagnosis. Patients were seen by the oncologist an hour or two before treatment began chemotherapy or radiotherapy - and were asked immediately after the consultation to rate the doctor's communication skills and behaviour. While there was little evidence that communication influenced either coping or quality of life six to eight weeks later, there was good evidence that patients' reported anxiety and depression as they came out of the consultation did have longer term effects. In the second part of the investigation, a new set of patients were assigned to have their pre-treatment consultation under one of two conditions: in the ''experimental'' condition doctors were trained to give information in a way that would be understood properly and would help to reduce anxiety and depression; in the ''control'' condition they received no special training and continued as before. The results showed that outcomes were markedly better in the experimental condition than the control condition, and that a reduction in anxiety and depression was the key factor.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/08870449608406922
Uncontrolled keywords: cancer; communication; outcome
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Depositing User: F.D. Zabet
Date Deposited: 06 May 2009 11:06 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 09:57 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/18775 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Rutter, Derek R..

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:

Quine, Lyn.

Creator's ORCID:
CReDIT Contributor Roles:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.