Slaughter, Marty (2000) Contested identities: The adoption of American Indian children and the liberal state. Social and Legal Studies, 9 (2). pp. 227-248. ISSN 0964-6639. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900203) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided)
|The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided. (Contact us about this Publication)|
The Indian Child Welfare Act gives the tribes the power to determine the placement of Indian children. American I;Indian tribes are semi-sovereign entities which retain the power to control their internal affairs and are not constrained by the Constitution. In making child welfare determinations tribes engage in practices which in other cases would be unconstitutional: they apply group rights to trump parental interests and they determine tribal membership on the basis of criteria which are arguably racial. The Act reveals the irresolvable conflict between tribal norms and concepts of identity and those found in American liberalism.
H Social Sciences
|Depositing User:||A. Xie|
|Date Deposited:||07 Sep 2009 13:07 UTC|
|Last Modified:||06 May 2014 13:11 UTC|
|Resource URI:||https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/16634 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)|