Skip to main content

Do somatic markers need to be somatic? Analogies from evolution and from hardware interlocks

Johnson, Colin G. (2004) Do somatic markers need to be somatic? Analogies from evolution and from hardware interlocks. In: Proceedings of the AISB 2004 Convention. . pp. 33-35. Sociaty for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (KAR id:14176)

Language: English
Click to download this file (43kB) Preview
[thumbnail of Do_somatic_markers_need_to_be_somatic_Analogies_from_evolution.pdf]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format


This paper considers Damasio's concept of the somatic marker from two new perspectives. The first of these considers them from the point of view of Dawkins's concept of the extended phenotype. This is used to develop the idea of the extended somatic marker, viz. a marker which uses some non-somatic feature of the external world in a similar fashion to the somatic marker. Secondly an analogy is developed with the concept of hardware interlocks in safety-critical systems. This is used to suggest why it is important that somatic markers are bodily states and not just mental markers.

Item Type: Conference or workshop item (Paper)
Uncontrolled keywords: cognitive science, somatic marker hypothesis, body and mind
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics (inc Computing science) > QA 76 Software, computer programming,
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Computing, Engineering and Mathematical Sciences > School of Computing
Depositing User: Mark Wheadon
Date Deposited: 24 Nov 2008 18:02 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 09:52 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
Johnson, Colin G.:
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views for this document in KAR since July 2020. For more details click on the image.