Skip to main content

The Elephant in the Room: A Response to John Horgan and Michael Boyle

Blakeley, Ruth (2008) The Elephant in the Room: A Response to John Horgan and Michael Boyle. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1 (2). pp. 151-165. ISSN 1753-9161. (doi:10.1080/17539150802184561) (KAR id:11950)

PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download (226kB) Preview
[thumbnail of The Elephant in the Room final [Blakeley] Author's Post-Print Version for KAR.pdf]
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Official URL:


This paper is written in response to John Horgan and Michael J. Boyle, whose article, ‘The Case Against a “Critical Terrorism Studies”’, appeared in the last issue of the journal Critical Studies on Terrorism. The paper addresses the claim that the call for a greater emphasis on state terrorism by liberal democratic states in terrorism studies constitutes a ‘reinventing of the wheel’. I show that there continues to be a selective application of definitions of terrorism so that state terrorism in which liberal democratic states are complicit continues to be widely ignored. This results in considerable gaps in the literature, which I identify. I argue that the absence of state terrorism by liberal democratic states from debate results from a complex range of factors that influence scholars across the social sciences, which I discuss in detail. I then show that a credible research agenda exists and is already being pursued by Critical Terrorism Studies scholars, and that that this goes well beyond simply reinventing the wheel. Finally I show that where work on state terrorism by liberal democratic states is concerned, an explicit aim is to explore the use of state terrorism within the broader context of the foreign policy objectives of liberal democratic states. Those objectives have consistently involved widening access to resources and markets in the global South, and competing for political and economic dominance. I show that a priority of those working on state terrorism by liberal democratic states should be to offer alternatives to foreign policy practices that involve state terrorism and other forms of repression.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/17539150802184561
Uncontrolled keywords: state terrorism; terrorism studies; state violence; repression; torture; human rights; Global North; Global South; liberal democratic states; emancipation
Subjects: J Political Science
J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Politics and International Relations
Depositing User: Ruth Blakeley
Date Deposited: 24 Mar 2009 15:36 UTC
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2021 09:50 UTC
Resource URI: (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)
  • Depositors only (login required):


Downloads per month over past year