Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Tracing the untraceable: A review and discussion on the forensic attribution of 3D-printed firearms

Snasdell, Abi, Shepherd, Chris, Patel, Bhaven, Sykes, Daniel, Da Silva Sil Dos Santos, Bruno (2026) Tracing the untraceable: A review and discussion on the forensic attribution of 3D-printed firearms. WIREs Forensic Science, 8 (4). Article Number e70033. E-ISSN 2573-9468. (doi:10.1002/wfs2.70033) (KAR id:116869)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/2MB)
[thumbnail of WIREs Forensic Science - 2026 - Snasdell - Tracing the Untraceable  A Review and Discussion on the Forensic Attribution of.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this publication
[thumbnail of Tracing the Untraceable Manuscript Final Version.docx]
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English
Download this file
(PDF/1MB)
[thumbnail of Tracing the Untraceable Manuscript Final Version (1).pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.70033

Abstract

The rise of 3D-printed firearms (3DPFs) presents challenges for forensic science, law enforcement, and regulation. Unlike traditional weapons, 3DPFs can be manufactured using consumer-grade additive manufacturing systems and open-source designs, with the absence of serial numbers limiting traceability. Unconventional and inconsistent toolmarks produced during manufacture and firing complicate forensic attribution, or association, to specific printers and restrict linking bullets and cartridge cases to individual 3DPFs. Since 2021, prevalence has increased globally, with UK cases rising by 733% between 2021 and 2023. This work examines: (1) the expanding threat from 3DPF-related crime, (2) forensic challenges in linking 3DPFs to printers and ammunition, and (3) advances in quantitative identification. Conventional firearm examination techniques, particularly those relying on rifling impressions, are often unsuitable for fused deposition manufactured 3DPFs, which commonly use plastic or improvised smooth-bore barrels. Although firing marks can transfer to ammunition, their distinctiveness and reproducibility vary with design and manufacturing method, limiting reliability. Alternative approaches include analyzing nozzle drag marks, deposition striae, and base-plate marks for printer attribution, although variability in printers, parameters, materials, wear, and subclass characteristics may affect robustness. Spectroscopic and mass-spectrometric techniques show promise for detecting polymer and gunshot residues, including hybrid polymer–primer particles, but datasets remain limited. The UK's shift towards quantitative reporting has driven research into methods such as micro-CT, geometric measurement, and Congruent Matching Cells for conventional firearms; however, these remain underexplored for 3DPFs. Overall, attribution is feasible but complex, requiring continued interdisciplinary research and robust, 3DPF-specific forensic protocols.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1002/wfs2.70033
Uncontrolled keywords: 3D-printing; firearms; trace; evidence; additive manufacturing
Subjects: Q Science
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) > TA 418.9 Materials of special composition or structure
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Chemistry and Forensic Science
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Depositing User: Chris Shepherd
Date Deposited: 12 Oct 2026 08:45 UTC
Last Modified: 14 Oct 2026 02:41 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/116869 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.