Roberts, David L., Nurse, Jason R. C. (2026) Assessing safeguards against the illegal wildlife trade on AI platforms. Conservation Biology, . Article Number e70400. ISSN 0888-8892. E-ISSN 1523-1739. (doi:10.1111/cobi.70400) (KAR id:116539)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70400 |
|
Abstract
AI platforms, while offering many positive applications, also present new risks to society, including the facilitation of trade in threatened and illegal wildlife. Although these platforms employ safeguards to block harmful or criminal requests, studies show such protections are imperfect and can be easily bypassed. To better understand these risks, we investigated the potential for AI platforms to enable wildlife trafficking, evaluated their safeguards, and tested how easily those safeguards might be circumvented. We applied a test set/case methodology based on three prompts across seven AI platforms (plus a Google earch) for 20 taxa. Further, we analyzed the outputs based on four emergent themes: statements of legality, conservation status, suggested substitutions, and welfare concerns. Overall, AI platforms performed better than a standard Google search at preventing potentially illegal wildlife trade, with the highest overall scores for Gemini, closely followed by DeepSeek, Grok, and ChatGPT. However, AI platforms were not infallible, as observed when a prompt was given in an attempt to circumvent the platform's safeguards, which resulted in links to potential websites trading in possibly illegal wildlife. However, AI platforms provided additional information, particularly on legality, that informed would-be consumers. The strongest safeguarding responses were seen for charismatic taxa such as slow loris (Nycticebus spp.), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), and tiger (Panthera tigris), whereas the weakest responses were for taxa that are less charismatic but of equal concern, such as corals, tarantulas, and orchids. This finding may reflect societal and political interests, given that AI platforms based on large language models are trained with online information. Although AI has the potential to provide a route for consumers to purchase illegal wildlife, platforms currently appear to provide additional information to would-be consumers, allowing them to make a more informed purchasing decision than they would with a standard Google search.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/cobi.70400 |
| Institutional Unit: |
Schools > School of Computing Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
| Depositing User: | Rosalyn Bass |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Sep 2026 08:32 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2026 02:39 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/116539 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6788-2691
Altmetric
Altmetric