Ó Ciardha, Caoilte, Buckley, John, Portnoff, Rebecca S. (2026) AI-generated child sexual abuse material: what’s the harm? AI & Society, . ISSN 0951-5666. (doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02932-y) (KAR id:115920)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/456kB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02932-y |
|
| Resource title: | Correction: AI-generated child sexual abuse material: what’s the harm? |
|---|---|
| Resource type: | Correction |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00146-026-03231-2 |
| KDR/KAR URL: | |
| External URL: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03231-2 |
Abstract
The development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools capable of producing wholly or partially synthetic child sexual abuse material (AI CSAM) presents profound challenges for child protection, law enforcement, and societal responses to child exploitation. While some argue that the harmfulness of AI CSAM differs fundamentally from other CSAM due to a perceived absence of direct victimization, this perspective fails to account for the range of risks associated with its production and consumption. AI has been implicated in the creation of synthetic CSAM of children who have not previously been abused, the revictimization of known survivors of abuse, the facilitation of grooming, coercion, and sexual extortion, and the normalization of child sexual exploitation. Additionally, AI CSAM may serve as a new or enhanced pathway into offending by lowering barriers to engagement, desensitizing users to progressively extreme content, and undermining protective factors for individuals with a sexual interest in children. Drawing on a narrative review and conceptual synthesis of technical literature, psychological and criminological research, and civil society and law enforcement reporting, this paper provides a high-level primer on key generative AI technologies and examines the harms associated with AI CSAM. It cautions against claims that AI CSAM may function as a harm reduction tool, emphasizing how appeals to harmlessness obscure real risks and may contribute to inertia in ecosystem responses.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1007/s00146-026-02932-y |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | AI CSAM, Generative AI, Child exploitation, Online offending |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Psychology > Psychology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Depositing User: | Caoilte O Ciardha |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Aug 2026 10:19 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 19 Aug 2026 10:22 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/115920 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5383-8403
Altmetric
Altmetric