Figueira, Ana, Alleyne, Emma (2026) Risk and vulnerability in knife‐related crime: Insights from official data. Legal and Criminological Psychology, . ISSN 1355-3259. E-ISSN 2044-8333. (doi:10.1111/lcrp.70050) (KAR id:115789)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/563kB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70050 |
|
Abstract
Purpose
This study examines psychological and personal differences among young males engaged in violent knife offending, violent non-knife offending, and non-violent offending within a Youth Justice Service in London. By distinguishing knife-related crime from other forms of violence, the research aims to identify unique psychosocial vulnerabilities associated with violent knife offending and to consider implications for assessment and intervention.
Methods
Case files of young males aged 12–18 under Youth Justice Service supervision between 2018 and 2022 were analysed using data recorded in the AssetPlus assessment tool. Comparative analyses explored group differences in victimisation, gang association, trauma-related mental health difficulties, and neurodiversity needs. Moderated mediation models were employed to examine the relationship between gang involvement, victimisation, and knife-related offending.
Results
Young people involved in knife-related offending exhibited higher levels of gang association, victimisation, and trauma compared to both violent non-knife and non-violent groups. Victimisation significantly moderated the relationship between gang involvement and knife-related offending, amplifying the likelihood of violent behaviour among those with dual exposure. Mental health difficulties, although prevalent, did not mediate this relationship. AssetPlus facilitated comprehensive information-gathering but showed inconsistencies in analytical application, with variability in data entry quality highlighting the need for standardised quality assurance.
Conclusions
Findings indicate that violent knife offending represents a distinct subgroup characterised by elevated psychosocial vulnerabilities. Trauma-informed and contextually aware interventions are essential, with supplementary assessments focusing on gang involvement and victimisation recommended to enhance understanding of individual risk profiles and support more tailored responses to knife-related offending.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1111/lcrp.70050 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | adverse childhood experiences; gang associations; Knife-related crime; mental health; victimisation; youth justice |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Psychology > Psychology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
| Depositing User: | Ana Figueira |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Jul 2026 14:43 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 27 Jul 2026 10:26 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/115789 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1105-828X
Altmetric
Altmetric