Niksic, Maja, Hamilton-West, Kate E., Forbes, Lindsay J.L., Osborne, Kirstie, Brasnell, Leia S. H., Hulbert, Sabina, Day, Kate, Whitelock, Victoria, Hotham, Sarah (2026) Re-validation of the Cancer Research UK Cancer Awareness Measure ‘Plus’ (CAM+): A study protocol. Frontiers in Public Health, . Article Number 1841597. ISSN 2296-2565. (Submitted) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:115248)
|
PDF (Submitted manuscript under review)
Draft Version
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
Contact us about this publication
|
|
Abstract
Background
The Cancer Research UK Cancer Awareness Measure (CRUK CAM) was introduced in 2008 as the first psychometrically validated survey of public attitudes, awareness and behaviours across cancer prevention, screening and early diagnosis. CRUK regularly collects CAM data in the UK to inform strategic planning. The measure has been modified over time in response to changes in the research, policy and practice landscape. Our aim is to revalidate the most recent CAM ‘Plus’ (CAM+) to ensure the measure remains accurate, reliable, valid, and relevant over time.
Methods There will be four phases, running from 2023 to 2026, with the CAM+ being revised after each phase. Phase 1 will start by auditing the CAM+ against a behaviour change framework, i.e., the COM-B, postulating that to engage in a Behaviour (B), a person must have the Capability (C) and Opportunity (O) to exhibit that behaviour, as well as the Motivation (M) to demonstrate it at a specific moment. This phase will also include a) scoping literature reviews; b) a face validity assessment, to check CRUK and scientific evidence needs and identify gaps in the survey; and, c) a readability assessment using the Hemingway App to check for long complex sentences. Phase 2 will focus on content validity, using two stages of cognitive interviews with members of the public to assess comprehension and clarity. The first stage will use a ‘Think Aloud’ methodology to identify potential problem areas; while the second stage will use the four-stage model of cognitive interviewing to understand how people comprehend, retrieve, judge, and respond to questions. In Phase 3, we will conduct exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to inform further refinements to the measure. In Phase 4, we will assess: a) construct validity, by comparing responses of cancer experts and non-cancer experts; b) reliability, using the test-retest approach; and c) responsiveness, using sensitivity to change to questions in CAM+, following a brief intervention. Throughout the revalidation process we will be adhering to the standards set out in the COSMIN guidelines.
Ethics Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Kent Staff Review Committee (0906).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled keywords: | validation, questionnaire, cancer awareness, early prevention behaviour, early diagnosis |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Social Sciences > Centre for Health Services Studies |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | Cancer Research UK (https://ror.org/054225q67) |
| Depositing User: | Maja Niksic |
| Date Deposited: | 16 May 2026 09:23 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 16 May 2026 10:53 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/115248 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3101-4953
Total Views
Total Views