Weekes, Cassidy J., Storey, Jennifer E., Pina, Afroditi (2026) Comparing experiences of cyberstalking from victim and perpetrator perspectives. Psychology, Crime & Law, . pp. 1-20. ISSN 1068-316X. E-ISSN 1477-2744. (doi:10.1080/1068316X.2026.2700773) (KAR id:115035)
|
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
| Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
|
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX)
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
Contact us about this publication
|
|
|
PDF
Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English Restricted to Repository staff only |
|
|
Contact us about this publication
|
|
| Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2026.2700773 |
|
Abstract
This exploratory study examines cyberstalking from both victim and perpetrator perspectives using two questionnaires. A total of 505 respondents of the victimisation questionnaire and 527 respondents of the perpetration questionnaire indicated a cyberstalking victimisation prevalence rate of 14.7% and a cyberstalking perpetration prevalence rate of 2.1%. Victims most commonly reported experiencing repeated, unwanted online contact (98.6%), while perpetrators most frequently reported engaging in online monitoring (81.8%). Relationships between victims and perpetrators varied, including current or ex-intimate partners, friends/ex-friends, and strangers. Common motivations included revenge (44.6% of victims; 36.4% of perpetrators) and reconciliation (41.9% of victims; 36.4% of perpetrators). Findings highlight a juxtaposition in the reported prevalence of cyberstalking by victims and perpetrators, indicating victims most often report unwanted contact, but perpetrators most often report covert monitoring. Evidently, cyberstalking can be perpetrated without the victim’s knowledge and this has important implications for operationalising cyberstalking and identifying victimisation and perpetration rates.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| DOI/Identification number: | 10.1080/1068316X.2026.2700773 |
| Uncontrolled keywords: | stalking; cyberstalking; perpetration; victimisation; legislation |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Institutional Unit: | Schools > School of Psychology > Psychology |
| Former Institutional Unit: |
There are no former institutional units.
|
| Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
| Depositing User: | Afroditi Pina |
| Date Deposited: | 13 May 2026 22:16 UTC |
| Last Modified: | 18 Aug 2026 15:25 UTC |
| Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/115035 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7758-1375
Altmetric
Altmetric