Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Comparing experiences of cyberstalking from victim and perpetrator perspectives

Weekes, Cassidy J., Storey, Jennifer E., Pina, Afroditi (2026) Comparing experiences of cyberstalking from victim and perpetrator perspectives. Psychology, Crime & Law, . pp. 1-20. ISSN 1068-316X. E-ISSN 1477-2744. (doi:10.1080/1068316X.2026.2700773) (KAR id:115035)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/1MB)
[thumbnail of Comparing experiences of cyberstalking from victim and perpetrator perspectives.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX) Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this publication
[thumbnail of PCL Accepted Version.docx]
PDF Author's Accepted Manuscript
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this publication
[thumbnail of PCL Accepted Version.pdf]
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2026.2700773

Abstract

This exploratory study examines cyberstalking from both victim and perpetrator perspectives using two questionnaires. A total of 505 respondents of the victimisation questionnaire and 527 respondents of the perpetration questionnaire indicated a cyberstalking victimisation prevalence rate of 14.7% and a cyberstalking perpetration prevalence rate of 2.1%. Victims most commonly reported experiencing repeated, unwanted online contact (98.6%), while perpetrators most frequently reported engaging in online monitoring (81.8%). Relationships between victims and perpetrators varied, including current or ex-intimate partners, friends/ex-friends, and strangers. Common motivations included revenge (44.6% of victims; 36.4% of perpetrators) and reconciliation (41.9% of victims; 36.4% of perpetrators). Findings highlight a juxtaposition in the reported prevalence of cyberstalking by victims and perpetrators, indicating victims most often report unwanted contact, but perpetrators most often report covert monitoring. Evidently, cyberstalking can be perpetrated without the victim’s knowledge and this has important implications for operationalising cyberstalking and identifying victimisation and perpetration rates.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1080/1068316X.2026.2700773
Uncontrolled keywords: stalking; cyberstalking; perpetration; victimisation; legislation
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Psychology > Psychology
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Funders: University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56)
Depositing User: Afroditi Pina
Date Deposited: 13 May 2026 22:16 UTC
Last Modified: 18 Aug 2026 15:25 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/115035 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.