Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

The safety of isometric exercise: Rethinking the exercise prescription paradigm for those with stage 1 hypertension

Wiles, Jonathan D., Taylor, Katrina Ann, Coleman, Damian, Sharma, Rajan, O’Driscoll, Jamie M. (2018) The safety of isometric exercise: Rethinking the exercise prescription paradigm for those with stage 1 hypertension. Medicine, 97 (10). Article Number e0105. ISSN 0025-7974. (doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000010105) (Access to this publication is currently restricted. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:114456)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Medicine - Safety of isometric exercise.pdf]
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010105

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the relative safety of prescribing isometric exercise (IE) to reduce resting blood pressure (BP). This study aimed to ascertain the safety of the hemodynamic response during an IE wall squat protocol.

Twenty-six hypertensive (BP of 120–139 mm Hg systolic and/or 80–90 mm Hg diastolic) males (45 ± 8 years; 1.78 ± 0.07 m; 89.7 ± 12.3 kg; mean ± SD), visited the laboratory on 2 separate occasions. Heart rate (HR) and BP were measured at rest and continuously throughout exercise. In visit 1, participants completed a continuous incremental isometric wall squat exercise test, starting at 135° of knee flexion, decreasing by 10° every 2 minutes until 95° (final stage). Exercise was terminated upon completion of the test or volitional fatigue. The relationship between knee joint angle and mean HR was used to calculate the participant-specific knee joint angle required to elicit a target HR of 95% HRpeak. This angle was used to determine exercise intensity for a wall squat training session consisting of 4 × 2 minute bouts (visit 2).

Systolic BPs during the exercise test and training were 173 ± 21 mm Hg and 171 ± 19 mm Hg, respectively, (P > .05) and were positively related (r = 0.73, P < .05) with ratio limits of agreement (LoA) of 0.995 ×/÷ 1.077. Diastolic BPs were 116 ± 14 mm Hg and 113 ± 11 mm Hg, respectively, (P > .05) and were positively related (r = 0.42, P < .05) with ratio LoA of 0.99 ×/÷ 1.107. No participant recorded a systolic BP > 250 mm Hg. Diastolic BP values > 115 mm Hg were recorded in 12 participants during the incremental test and 6 participants during the training session. Peak rate pressure product was 20681 ± 3911 mm Hg bpm during the IE test and was lower (18074 ± 3209 mm Hg bpm) during the IE session (P = .002). No adverse effects were reported.

Based on the current ACSM guidelines for aerobic exercise termination, systolic BP does not reach the upper limit during IE in this population. Diastolic BP exceeds 115 mm Hg in some during the IE protocol, which may suggest the need to individualise IE training prescription in some with suboptimal BP control. Future research is required to ascertain if IE requires modified BP termination guidelines.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010105
Uncontrolled keywords: exercise training; incremental test; isometric; squat; static
Subjects: R Medicine
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Sports and Exercise Science
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Funders: Canterbury Christ Church University (https://ror.org/0489ggv38)
Depositing User: Katrina Taylor
Date Deposited: 07 May 2026 18:51 UTC
Last Modified: 08 May 2026 13:54 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/114456 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.