Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Sustaining biodiversity in coconut-dominated agroecosystems: insights from passive acoustic monitoring

Butarbutar, Robby B., Yoh, Natalie, Winarni, Nurul L., Hunowu, Iwan, Deere, Nicolas J., Meijaard, Erik, Tasirin, John, Barton, Catherine, Poudyal, Mahesh, Struebig, Matthew J. and others. (2026) Sustaining biodiversity in coconut-dominated agroecosystems: insights from passive acoustic monitoring. Environmental Research: Ecology, 5 (2). Article Number 025010. (doi:10.1088/2752-664X/ae7605) (KAR id:114215)

PDF Publisher pdf
Language: English


Download this file
(PDF/3MB)
[thumbnail of Butarbutar_2026_Environ._Res.__Ecology_5_025010.pdf]
Preview
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader
XML Word Processing Document (DOCX) Updated Version
Language: English

Restricted to Repository staff only
Contact us about this publication
[thumbnail of Butarbutar_coconut_acoustic_diversity_FIN_RB_SOURCE_Rev.docx]
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-664X/ae7605

Abstract

Coconut cultivation is concentrated in coastal and island regions that harbor high species diversity and are particularly vulnerable to disturbance. Yet, coconut sustainability standards lack clear biodiversity safeguards despite rising global demand. We assessed how different coconut production systems influence biodiversity in North Sulawesi, Indonesia, using an acoustic index as a validated proxy for acoustic diversity. Across 56 sites and 2410 recording hours, we compared forests, coconut monocultures, and coconut agroforestry systems, and evaluated the influence of local vegetation and landscape variables on temporal acoustic dynamics. Forests supported the highest acoustic index values, while monocultures were lowest, with pronounced divergence at dawn and dusk. Coconut agroforests buffered these extremes: acoustic diversity remained relatively stable across the day and occasionally approached or exceeded forest levels, suggesting that mixed farming systems can sustain more vocally diverse animal communities than monocultures. Within farms, the density of small trees (primarily cocoa intercrops) was positively associated with acoustic diversity during afternoon period, whereas larger orchard trees exerted weaker influence. At the landscape scale, the proportion of forest cover around a locality was the strongest predictor of acoustic diversity, highlighting the role of forest vegetation in maintaining biodiversity across production landscapes. Our findings confirm that natural forests are irreplaceable for biodiversity, but coconut agroforestry can provide meaningful ecological benefits when embedded in forested landscapes. These insights underscore the need for emerging sustainability frameworks to incorporate explicit biodiversity criteria, including forest retention, intercrop diversity, and vertical structure, and to align with cross-commodity standards such as those in cocoa, given that coconut and cocoa are frequently intercropped.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1088/2752-664X/ae7605
Uncontrolled keywords: coconut; agroforestry,; avian; passive acoustic monitoring; bioacoustics; sustainability; landscape ecology
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH541 Ecology
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH75 Conservation (Biology)
S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Institutional Unit: Schools > School of Natural Sciences > Conservation
Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Funders: Natural Environment Research Council (https://ror.org/02b5d8509)
Leverhulme Trust (https://ror.org/012mzw131)
Depositing User: Matthew Struebig
Date Deposited: 30 Apr 2026 09:29 UTC
Last Modified: 04 Aug 2026 13:46 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/114215 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

Butarbutar, Robby B..

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-3889
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Writing - review and editing, Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Resources, Visualisation, Writing - original draft, Conceptualisation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Software

Yoh, Natalie.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6171-3800
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Supervision, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

Deere, Nicolas J..

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1299-2126
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Data curation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

Meijaard, Erik.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8685-3685
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Supervision, Conceptualisation, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing

Poudyal, Mahesh.

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0351-7764
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Funding acquisition, Conceptualisation, Supervision, Writing - review and editing

Struebig, Matthew J..

Creator's ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2058-8502
CReDIT Contributor Roles: Investigation (Equal), Project administration (Supporting), Methodology (Equal), Writing - review and editing (Lead), Visualisation (Supporting), Writing - original draft (Equal)
  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.