Skip to main content
Kent Academic Repository

Ecological and economic analysis of poaching of the greater one‐horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) in Nepal

Poudyal, Mahesh, Rothley, Kristina, Knowler, Duncan (2009) Ecological and economic analysis of poaching of the greater one‐horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) in Nepal. Ecological Applications, 19 (7). pp. 1693-1707. ISSN 1051-0761. (doi:10.1890/09-0009.1) (The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided) (KAR id:113745)

The full text of this publication is not currently available from this repository. You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided.
Official URL:
https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0009.1

Abstract

Nepal's greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) faces serious threats from poaching. Poaching of these rhinos is a complex problem, influenced by such diverse factors as the price of rhino horn on the international market, local socioeconomic factors, and the population dynamics of the species. Few studies have attempted to address this complexity. In this study, we model the poaching and population dynamics of the one-horned rhinoceros within an integrated framework of ecological, socioeconomic, political, and legal dimensions. The poaching model for rhinos in Royal Chitwan National Park (RCNP) in Nepal is combined with the population model for the species within a simulation framework and explored under various alternative policy scenarios with differing external socioeconomic and political conditions as well as internal policy response. We predict that, under the current (2003–2005) rhino conservation strategy, poaching would continue to be a major threat to the rhino population in RCNP. Furthermore, the internal policy response must begin to consider external factors such as socioeconomic conditions within the park buffer zone to be more effective in the long run. Finally, we find that, for long-run control, antipoaching policies should be directed at increasing the opportunity costs of poaching by creating better alternative economic opportunities, and at antipoaching enforcement.

Item Type: Article
DOI/Identification number: 10.1890/09-0009.1
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
Institutional Unit: Institutes > Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology
Former Institutional Unit:
There are no former institutional units.
Depositing User: Mahesh Poudyal
Date Deposited: 10 Apr 2026 09:57 UTC
Last Modified: 13 Apr 2026 09:44 UTC
Resource URI: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/113745 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes)

University of Kent Author Information

  • Depositors only (login required):

Total unique views of this page since July 2020. For more details click on the image.