Rasaiya, Raahavy (2025) Reimagining Power, Sexuality, and Governance: Unearthing Colonial Biopolitics in South Asia and British Ceylon (1815-1948). Master of Laws by Research (LLMRes) thesis, University of Kent,. (doi:10.22024/UniKent/01.02.109491) (KAR id:109491)
PDF
Language: English |
|
Download this file (PDF/799kB) |
Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/01.02.109491 |
Abstract
This thesis explores the racial, gendered, and sexual infrastructures of British colonial administration concerning the reordering of women's sexuality in colonial Sri Lanka, historically known as Ceylon. Through a Foucauldian biopolitical framework, complemented by feminist and anti-colonial perspectives, the study examines how colonial rule sought to regulate and control female sexuality as a means of sustaining imperial dominance. The analysis is structured around three interrelated themes: prostitution under the British Contagious Diseases Acts (CDA), the colonial intervention in the devadasi system, and the regulation of motherhood. These themes illustrate how the British colonial government utilised legal, medical, and socio-cultural discourses to exert power over women's bodies and reproductive roles. The CDA, enacted to protect British military personnel from sexually transmitted diseases, effectively subjected women to invasive surveillance and control. Similarly, the colonial administration's focus on the devadasi system-stripping it of its cultural and artistic significance-underscores the intersection of imperial moralism and gendered governance. Finally, the regulation of motherhood through colonial reproductive policies reveals the imposition of metropolitan norms onto local gender and familial structures.
Situating Ceylon within the broader South Asian context, this study compares colonial governance strategies between India and Ceylon, highlighting both shared and distinct mechanisms of control. The methodological approach aligns with the 'imperial turn' in historiography, emphasising the interconnectedness of the metropole and the colony as co-constitutive spaces of knowledge production and power. While Foucault's concept of biopolitics provides a foundational lens, this research also acknowledges its Eurocentric limitations and engages with scholars such as Ann Laura Stoler and Gayatri Spivak to critique and extend biopolitical analysis in colonial contexts. This thesis ultimately argues that the colonial administration's governance of female sexuality was not only an exercise in discipline and control but also a fundamental component of the imperial project, shaping racial and gender hierarchies that continue to inform postcolonial power structures.
Item Type: | Thesis (Master of Laws by Research (LLMRes)) |
---|---|
Thesis advisor: | Drakopoulou, Maria |
Thesis advisor: | Renz, Flora |
DOI/Identification number: | 10.22024/UniKent/01.02.109491 |
Uncontrolled keywords: | Colonialism, Biopower, Ceylon, Motherhood, Devadasis, Imperialism, Feminism, Postcolonial Theory, Foucault, Colonial Governmentality, Epistemic Violence, Sexual Regulation, Contagious Diseases Act, Gendered Hierarchies, Subaltern Studies, Prostitution, Empire, British Raj |
Subjects: | D History General and Old World |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice > Kent Law School |
Funders: | University of Kent (https://ror.org/00xkeyj56) |
SWORD Depositor: | System Moodle |
Depositing User: | System Moodle |
Date Deposited: | 02 Apr 2025 13:10 UTC |
Last Modified: | 04 Apr 2025 09:27 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/109491 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):