Boyd, Ryan L., Morrison, Nicholas R., Horwitz, Sarah D., Maciag, Rachel, Travers-Hill, Emma, Kim, Youngsuk (2024) Are we listening to every word? Using multiple analytic methods to examine qualitative data. Cogent Mental Health, 3 (1). pp. 1-24. E-ISSN 2832-4765. (doi:10.1080/28324765.2024.2433791) (KAR id:108206)
PDF
Publisher pdf
Language: English
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
Download this file (PDF/1MB) |
Preview |
Request a format suitable for use with assistive technology e.g. a screenreader | |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/28324765.2024.2433791 |
Abstract
Psychological researchers are increasingly striving to enhance methodological integrity, including in qualitative methods. Although computerized text analysis tools originally emerged as a potential replacement for manual coding approaches, recent studies have underscored the unique yet complementary value of employing several methods. The current study applies two text analysis methods across one qualitative dataset to explore whether each method yields information not clearly evidenced by the other, nor through traditional thematic analysis. Interviews exploring the experiences of paraprofessionals delivering Brief Psychological Interventions (BPIs) were analyzed through Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and the Meaning Extraction Method (MEM). Results revealed LIWC, MEM, and thematic analysis to be complementary in nature, each providing unique insights that could be missed by implementing any one method alone. Moreover, text analyses can serve as a form of validation for more traditional qualitative approaches while also revealing otherwise indiscernible relationships and patterns within texts.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
DOI/Identification number: | 10.1080/28324765.2024.2433791 |
Additional information: | ** Article version: VoR ** From Crossref journal articles via Jisc Publications Router ** History: epub 03-12-2024; issued 03-12-2024; published 03-12-2024; ppub 31-12-2024. ** Licence for VoR version of this article starting on 03-12-2024: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Uncontrolled keywords: | qualitative methods; text analysis; thematic analysis; LIWC; Meaning Extraction Method |
Subjects: |
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Divisions > Division of Human and Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
SWORD Depositor: | JISC Publications Router |
Depositing User: | JISC Publications Router |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jan 2025 14:21 UTC |
Last Modified: | 24 Jan 2025 10:47 UTC |
Resource URI: | https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/108206 (The current URI for this page, for reference purposes) |
- Link to SensusAccess
- Export to:
- RefWorks
- EPrints3 XML
- BibTeX
- CSV
- Depositors only (login required):